Ramirez v. McCravy

37 So. 3d 240, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 279, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 797, 2010 WL 1994654
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 20, 2010·No. SC09-490·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Ramirez v. McCravy, 4 So.3d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), based on express and direct conflict with Hankey v. Yarian, 755 So.2d 93 (Fla.2000), and Sullivan v. State, 913 So.2d 762 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs with an opinion.

QUINCE, C.J., dissents. LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez v. McCravy, 37 So. 3d 240, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 279, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 797, 2010 WL 1994654 (Fla. 2010).

37 So. 3d 240 (Ramirez v. McCravy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
95 So. 3d 96 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Ramirez v. McCravy
37 So. 3d 240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)