Ramirez v. Indiana
471 U.S. 147, 105 S. Ct. 1860, 85 L. Ed. 2d 113, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 201
Opinion
RAMIREZ
v.
INDIANA
Supreme Court of United States.
Kenneth F. Ripple, by appointment of the Court, 469 U. S. 1015, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David T. Link, Douglas W. Kenyon, Mollie A. Murphy, and Richard S. Myers.
William E. Daily, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General, and Lisa M. Paunicka, Deputy Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramirez v. Indiana, 471 U.S. 147, 105 S. Ct. 1860, 85 L. Ed. 2d 113, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 201 (1985).
471 U.S. 147 (Ramirez v. Indiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacob L. Maciaszek v. State of Indiana
113 N.E.3d 788 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2018)
Jacob Maciaszek v. State of Indiana
75 N.E.3d 1089 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2017)
Espinoza v. State
949 S.W.2d 10 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
People v. Newton
764 P.2d 1182 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1988)
Bertucci v. State
528 N.E.2d 90 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1988)
Starks v. State
517 N.E.2d 46 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1987)