Ramirez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramirez v. City of New York

90 A.D.3d 1009, 934 N.Y.2d 838

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2011·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The portion of the order from which the plaintiff appeals is not embodied in a decretal paragraph and does not otherwise grant or deny relief. Instead, that portion of the order is a conclusion of law which is not independently appealable (see Higgins v Higgins, 50 AD3d 852, 852 [2008]; Cosh v Cosh, 45 AD3d 798, 799 [2007]; Griggs v Griggs, 44 AD3d 710, 711 [2007]; ELRAC, Inc. v Belessis, 303 AD2d 445, 446 [2003]; Napolitano v Kaddoch, 275 AD2d 445 [2000]; Naar v Litwak & Co., 260 AD2d 613, 614 [1999]; Clark v Weiner, 254 AD2d 322 [1998]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Rivera, J.E, Eng, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The portion of the order from which the plaintiff appeals is not embodied in a decretal paragraph and does not otherwise grant or deny relief. Instead, that portion of the order is a conclusion of law which is not independently appealable (see Higgins v Higgins, 50 AD3d 852, 852 [2008]; Cosh v Cosh, 45 AD3d 798, 799 [2007]; Griggs v Griggs, 44 AD3d 710, 711 [2007]; ELRAC, Inc. v Belessis, 303 AD2d 445, 446 [2003]; Napolitano v Kaddoch, 275 AD2d 445 [2000]; Naar v Litwak & Co., 260 AD2d 613, 614 [1999]; Clark v Weiner, 254 AD2d 322 [1998]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Rivera, J.E, Eng, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Ramirez v. City of New York, 90 A.D.3d 1009, 934 N.Y.2d 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

90 A.D.3d 1009 (Ramirez v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related