Napolitano v. Kaddoch

275 A.D.2d 445, 712 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 28, 2000·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Lung Man Hui appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Klarsfeld, J.H.O.), dated September 8, 1999, as determined, inter alia, after a hearing, that he was the owner of the automobile which struck the plaintiffs vehicle.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

On this appeal, the appellant challenges certain findings of fact made after a hearing. However, findings of fact are not independently appealable and consequently, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Naar v Litwak & Co., 260 AD2d 613; Matter of County of Westchester v O’Neill, 191 AD2d 556). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Napolitano v. Kaddoch, 275 A.D.2d 445, 712 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 445 (Napolitano v. Kaddoch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramirez v. City of New York
90 A.D.3d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Noelia T.
70 A.D.3d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Lester & Associates, P.C. v. Eneman
69 A.D.3d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
DiSanto v. DiSanto
29 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Valee v. Macina
280 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Aragona v. CIN-MAR Developers, Inc.
277 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)