Napolitano v. Kaddoch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Napolitano v. Kaddoch

275 A.D.2d 445, 712 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 28, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 445 (Napolitano v. Kaddoch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napolitano v. Kaddoch, 275 A.D.2d 445, 712 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Lung Man Hui appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Klarsfeld, J.H.O.), dated September 8, 1999, as determined, inter alia, after a hearing, that he was the owner of the automobile which struck the plaintiffs vehicle.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

On this appeal, the appellant challenges certain findings of fact made after a hearing. However, findings of fact are not independently appealable and consequently, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Naar v Litwak & Co., 260 AD2d 613; Matter of County of Westchester v O’Neill, 191 AD2d 556). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Lung Man Hui appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Klarsfeld, J.H.O.), dated September 8, 1999, as determined, inter alia, after a hearing, that he was the owner of the automobile which struck the plaintiffs vehicle.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

On this appeal, the appellant challenges certain findings of fact made after a hearing. However, findings of fact are not independently appealable and consequently, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Naar v Litwak & Co., 260 AD2d 613; Matter of County of Westchester v O’Neill, 191 AD2d 556). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 445, 712 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napolitano-v-kaddoch-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack