Ramirez-Adan v. Ashcroft
This text of 63 F. App'x 982 (Ramirez-Adan v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Bonifacio Ramirez-Adan, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals the district [983]*983court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the denial of suspension of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo a district court’s denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, Taniguchi v. Schultz, 303 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm on other grounds.
The district court improperly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Ramirez-Adan’s habeas petition contending that the BIA’s extreme hardship finding was not made in accordance with the law. See Gutierrez-Chavez v. INS, 298 F.3d 824, 828 (9th Cir.2002).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [983]*983courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-adan-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.