Ramani v. Warner Music Group Corp
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 7445 (KMW) JUDGMENT WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP., Defendant. panne KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 26, 2025, the Court dismissed this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3), and granted Plaintiff 30 days’ leave to file an amended complaint to state facts demonstrating that his claims arise under federal law on June 5, 2025. On June 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed a document titled "Replead." (ECF 7.) The document does not include any facts demonstrating that the Court can exercise federal jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims. The Court has therefore dismissed this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Judgment is hereby entered in this action. Dated: New York, New York July 9, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court
BY: K. Mange Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramani v. Warner Music Group Corp (Ramani v. Warner Music Group Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.