Ralston v. Cunningham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Ralston v. Cunningham

18 A.2d 112, 143 Pa. Super. 421, 1941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 58

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 13, 1940

DocketAppeal, 315

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.2d 112 (Ralston v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ralston v. Cunningham, 18 A.2d 112, 143 Pa. Super. 421, 1941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 58 (Pa. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is a companion case to Ralston et al., Appellants, v. Cunningham et al., 143 Pa. Superior Ct. 412, 18 A. 2d 108. The appellees in that case are the appellants here. A petition for the allowance of counsel fee was filed in the court below on behalf of appellants under section 17 of the Act of June 2, 1937, P. L. 1198, 43 PS §206q, which provides : “Upon denial by the court of any injunctive relief sought in an action involving or growing out of a labor dispute, the court shall order the complainant to pay reasonable costs and expenses of defending the suit and a reasonable counsel fee.” The petition was dismissed by the court below.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Ralston et al., Appellants, v. Cunningham et al., supra, the order of the court below is affirmed, at the costs of appellants herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is a companion case to Ralston et al., Appellants, v. Cunningham et al., 143 Pa. Superior Ct. 412, 18 A. 2d 108. The appellees in that case are the appellants here. A petition for the allowance of counsel fee was filed in the court below on behalf of appellants under section 17 of the Act of June 2, 1937, P. L. 1198, 43 PS §206q, which provides : “Upon denial by the court of any injunctive relief sought in an action involving or growing out of a labor dispute, the court shall order the complainant to pay reasonable costs and expenses of defending the suit and a reasonable counsel fee.” The petition was dismissed by the court below.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Ralston et al., Appellants, v. Cunningham et al., supra, the order of the court below is affirmed, at the costs of appellants herein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.2d 112, 143 Pa. Super. 421, 1941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralston-v-cunningham-pasuperct-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack