Raines v. U.C.C. of N.J.
30 A.2d 31, 129 N.J.L. 387, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 190
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 388
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raines v. U.C.C. of N.J., 30 A.2d 31, 129 N.J.L. 387, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 190 (N.J. 1943).
30 A.2d 31 (Raines v. U.C.C. of N.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marshall v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.
76 F. Supp. 378 (D. Delaware, 1948)