Rainer v. State

944 So. 2d 115, 2006 WL 3410697
CourtCourt of Appeals of Mississippi
DecidedNovember 28, 2006
Docket2003-KA-01868-COA
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 944 So. 2d 115 (Rainer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rainer v. State, 944 So. 2d 115, 2006 WL 3410697 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinions

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is denied. The original opinion is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted in lieu thereof. After a bench trial, Thaddous Rainer was convicted of possession of more than thirty grams of cocaine and was sentenced to fifteen years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with eight years suspended, seven years to serve and three years of post-release supervision. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress *Page 117 evidence taken as the result of an unconstitutional search and seizure. Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Rainer's motion to suppress, we reverse and remand Rainer's conviction.

SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2. During the early part of September 2002, the narcotics division of the Hinds County Sheriff's Department received several complaints about illegal narcotics activities taking place around the Capitol Street area in the City of Jackson, Mississippi. On September 9, 2002, Investigator R.W. Spooner was patrolling the area of Capitol Street when he observed several individuals standing in the parking lot of a gas station located at 612 Capitol Street. In an effort to investigate the situation, Spooner entered the parking lot and pulled up next to a vehicle that was parked at a gas pump. Thaddous Rainer was at the wheel of the vehicle parked at the pump. Spooner then exited his car and identified himself as a police officer. According to Investigator Spooner, Rainer then "began to back out of the parking lot in an effort to flee." Rainer's progress was stymied when Captain Frank Bell maneuvered his car to block Rainer from exiting the parking lot. Upon blocking Rainer's exit, Bell ordered Rainer to step out of the car. Rainer then exited the car and threw several bags under his vehicle. The officers secured Rainer, retrieved the bags — which were later found to contain cocaine and marijuana — and placed Rainer under arrest for possession of cocaine and possession of marijuana less than one ounce.

¶ 3. At trial on the cocaine charge, Rainer moved to suppress the cocaine on the ground that it was seized as the result of an unreasonable search and seizure of his person under both the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and under Article 3, Section 23 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Rainer claimed that the officers had neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion for the stop. Citing the United States Supreme Court case of Illinois v. Wardlow,528 U.S. 119, 120 S.Ct. 673, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000) the trial court denied Rainer's motion, ruling that Rainer's attempt to leave the scene in a high crime area gave the police reasonable suspicion to detain him temporarily. Upon receiving this ruling, Rainer waived his right to a jury trial, and a bench trial proceeded. No testimony was adduced at trial, and the only evidence before the court was Investigator Spooner's typewritten report setting forth the details of the stop, and a report from the Mississippi Crime Laboratory identifying the seized substances. The trial judge convicted Rainer of possession of cocaine greater than thirty grams, and sentenced him to a term of fifteen years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with eight years suspended, seven years to serve and three years of supervised probation.

¶ 4. Aggrieved, Rainer filed a timely appeal to this Court, asserting that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Finding that the trial court erred in its determination that the officers had reasonable suspicion meriting an investigatory stop, we reverse and remand.

STANDARD OF REVIEW
¶ 5. Our well-settled standard of review for the admission or suppression of evidence is abuse of discretion.Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore, 863 So.2d 31,34 (¶ 4) (Miss. 2003). "Under this standard, this Court will affirm unless there is a definite and firm conviction that the court below committed a clear error of *Page 118 judgment in the conclusion it reached upon weighing of relevant factors." Caracci v. Int'l Paper Co.,699 So.2d 546, 556 (¶ 16) (Miss. 1997).

ISSUE AND ANALYSIS
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING RAINER'S MOTIONTO SUPPRESS

¶ 6. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 3, Section 23 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890 prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures made without probable cause, except under certain limited exceptions.See United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 825,102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); Walker v. State,881 So.2d 820, 827 (¶ 14) (Miss. 2004). In Terry v. Ohio,392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that an officer may, consistent with theFourth Amendment, make a brief, investigatory detention without a warrant when the officer has a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot. Id. at 30-31,88 S.Ct. 1868. While the "reasonable suspicion" standard is less demanding than probable cause, the Fourth Amendment still requires a minimal level of justification for making the stop.Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 123, 120 S.Ct. 673,145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000) (citing United States v.Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989)). Still, an officer who makes such a stop "must be able to point to specific and articulable facts" that justify the intrusion. Terry, 392 U.S. at 21, 88 S.Ct. 1868. In fact, "The officer must be able to articulate more than an `inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or "hunch"' of criminal activity" in order to justify a Terry stop.Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 123-24, 120 S.Ct. 673 (quotingTerry, 392 U.S. at 27, 88 S.Ct. 1868).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
944 So. 2d 115, 2006 WL 3410697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rainer-v-state-missctapp-2006.