Ragusa v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Ragusa v. United States

297 F.2d 525

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 21, 1961·No. Nos. 19086, 19087·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Motions of Appellant under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Rule 35, F.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate judgment or correct erroneous sentences were denied by the sentencing Court, and the appeals therefrom have been, on motion of Appellant, consolidated here for decision.

It being clear as to which sentence was to be first served, and that the other was to be served consecutively to it, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 119; and Fulton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 281.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Motions of Appellant under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Rule 35, F.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate judgment or correct erroneous sentences were denied by the sentencing Court, and the appeals therefrom have been, on motion of Appellant, consolidated here for decision.

It being clear as to which sentence was to be first served, and that the other was to be served consecutively to it, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 119; and Fulton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 281.

Ragusa v. United States, 297 F.2d 525 (5th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

297 F.2d 525 (Ragusa v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related