Ragusa v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Ragusa v. United States

297 F.2d 525

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 1961

DocketNos. 19086, 19087

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 F.2d 525 (Ragusa v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ragusa v. United States, 297 F.2d 525 (5th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Motions of Appellant under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Rule 35, F.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate judgment or correct erroneous sentences were denied by the sentencing Court, and the appeals therefrom have been, on motion of Appellant, consolidated here for decision.

It being clear as to which sentence was to be first served, and that the other was to be served consecutively to it, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 119; and Fulton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 281.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Motions of Appellant under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Rule 35, F.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate judgment or correct erroneous sentences were denied by the sentencing Court, and the appeals therefrom have been, on motion of Appellant, consolidated here for decision.

It being clear as to which sentence was to be first served, and that the other was to be served consecutively to it, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 119; and Fulton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 281.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 F.2d 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragusa-v-united-states-ca5-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack