Jay Alfred Ragusa v. United States
This text of 297 F.2d 525 (Jay Alfred Ragusa v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jay Alfred RAGUSA, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 19086, 19087.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1961.
Jay A. Ragusa, in pro. per.
B. Euple Dozier, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., H.M. Ray, U.S. Atty., Alfred E. Moreton, III, Asst. U.S. Atty, Oxford, Miss., for appellee.
Before RIVES, CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The Motions of Appellant under Title 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 and Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate judgment or correct erroneous sentences were denied by the sentencing Court, and the appeals therefrom have been, on motion of Appellant, consolidated here for decision.
It being clear as to which sentence was to be first served, and that the other was to be served consecutively to it, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir. 1951, 192 F. d 119; and Fulton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 281.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 F.2d 525, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 2893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jay-alfred-ragusa-v-united-states-ca5-1961.