Ragette v. Zimmer
90 N.Y.S. 1111
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ragette v. Zimmer. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 N.Y.S. 221 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 11, 1904·Published
Opinion
There does not seem to have been any reason for the bringing of this action. All the relief to which the plaintiffs are entitled to could have been secured in the action for specific performance. Indeed, it is difficult to see how this action could have been maintained, had a proper objection been interposed in time. We think that the judgment below should be modified, by striking therefrom the costs and disbursements, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ragette v. Zimmer, 90 N.Y.S. 1111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
90 N.Y.S. 1111 (Ragette v. Zimmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.