Ragette v. Zimmer

90 N.Y.S. 1111

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1111 (Ragette v. Zimmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ragette v. Zimmer, 90 N.Y.S. 1111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There does not seem to have been any reason for the bringing of this action. All the relief to which the plaintiffs are entitled to could have been secured in the action for specific performance. Indeed, it is difficult to see how this action could have been maintained, had a proper objection been interposed in time. We think that the judgment below should be modified, by striking therefrom the costs and disbursements, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragette-v-zimmer-nyappdiv-1904.