Ragen v. Barone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ragen v. Barone

252 So. 2d 389

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 21, 1971

DocketNo. 71-97

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 252 So. 2d 389 (Ragen v. Barone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ragen v. Barone, 252 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant who was the defendant below appeals a final judgment entered in an action upon a promissory note signed by the appellant. The point presented on appeal urges that the appellee-plaintiff “failed to carry his burden of proof by showing that he was entitled to judgment by the greater weight of the evidence.” We have reviewed the record in the light of the point presented and find the evidence sufficient. See Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd., Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 67.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant who was the defendant below appeals a final judgment entered in an action upon a promissory note signed by the appellant. The point presented on appeal urges that the appellee-plaintiff “failed to carry his burden of proof by showing that he was entitled to judgment by the greater weight of the evidence.” We have reviewed the record in the light of the point presented and find the evidence sufficient. See Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd., Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 67.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 So. 2d 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragen-v-barone-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack