Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd.
This text of 219 So. 2d 67 (Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, suing for real state commissions allegedly due him from defendants, suffered an adverse final judgment and appeals. All of the questions raised on [68]*68appeal turn on factual issues and from a review of the record we find contained therein competent, substantial evidence to sustain the finding's of the trial court who tried the case without a jury. Under such circumstances we are not entitled to substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact. First Atlantic National Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett, Fla.1955, 82 So.2d 870; Tucker v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 522; Leeb v. Read, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 830.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 So. 2d 67, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodzo-v-harbour-associates-ltd-fladistctapp-1969.