Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd.

219 So. 2d 67, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6138
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 1969·No. No. 1581·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, suing for real state commissions allegedly due him from defendants, suffered an adverse final judgment and appeals. All of the questions raised on [68] appeal turn on factual issues and from a review of the record we find contained therein competent, substantial evidence to sustain the finding's of the trial court who tried the case without a jury. Under such circumstances we are not entitled to substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact. First Atlantic National Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett, Fla.1955, 82 So.2d 870; Tucker v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 522; Leeb v. Read, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 830.

WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and GOODING, MARION W, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd., 219 So. 2d 67, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6138 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

219 So. 2d 67 (Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brickell Place Condominium Ass'n v. Western Waterproofing Co.
510 So. 2d 1176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Ragen v. Barone
252 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)