Ragar v. Ragar

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ragar v. Ragar

600 So. 2d 1203, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5820, 1992 WL 118334

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 1992

DocketNo. 90-2543

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 600 So. 2d 1203 (Ragar v. Ragar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ragar v. Ragar, 600 So. 2d 1203, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5820, 1992 WL 118334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the ruling of the trial court denying the parties’ motions for modification. We reverse the award of attorney fees on authority of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

For the benefit of the trial judge, we point out that a successor judge may not correct errors of law committed by his predecessor, and, hence, he cannot review and reverse on the merits and on the same facts the final orders of his predecessor. Groover v. Walker, 88 So.2d 312 (Fla.1956).

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the ruling of the trial court denying the parties’ motions for modification. We reverse the award of attorney fees on authority of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

For the benefit of the trial judge, we point out that a successor judge may not correct errors of law committed by his predecessor, and, hence, he cannot review and reverse on the merits and on the same facts the final orders of his predecessor. Groover v. Walker, 88 So.2d 312 (Fla.1956).

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 So. 2d 1203, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5820, 1992 WL 118334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragar-v-ragar-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack