Blackwell v. Blackwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blackwell v. Blackwell

589 So. 2d 969, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11119, 1991 WL 229794

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 1991

DocketNo. 90-03452

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 589 So. 2d 969 (Blackwell v. Blackwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackwell v. Blackwell, 589 So. 2d 969, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11119, 1991 WL 229794 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not conclude there was an abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the former wife’s petition for increased alimony. See Bedell v. Bedell, 583 So.2d 1005, 1007 (Fla.1991) (in a proceeding to increase alimony, “[A] substantial increase in the financial ability of the paying spouse, standing alone, may justify but does not require an order of increased alimony. Subject to the abuse of discretion principle set forth in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), the final decision rests with the circuit court.”); Compare Schlesinger v. Emmons, 566 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

We also do not conclude there was an abuse of discretion in the amount of the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to the former wife.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not conclude there was an abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the former wife’s petition for increased alimony. See Bedell v. Bedell, 583 So.2d 1005, 1007 (Fla.1991) (in a proceeding to increase alimony, “[A] substantial increase in the financial ability of the paying spouse, standing alone, may justify but does not require an order of increased alimony. Subject to the abuse of discretion principle set forth in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), the final decision rests with the circuit court.”); Compare Schlesinger v. Emmons, 566 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

We also do not conclude there was an abuse of discretion in the amount of the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to the former wife.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 So. 2d 969, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11119, 1991 WL 229794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackwell-v-blackwell-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack