Radin v. Radin

593 So. 2d 1233, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13427, 1991 WL 272715
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Radin v. Radin. Read the opinion of the Court — 593 So. 2d 1231
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 1991·No. Nos. 91-2442, 91-2771·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since this is not an appealable order, we treat this appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition. See Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We deny the petition.

The appellant had previously filed a motion for disqualification which was granted. As a result, the newly assigned judge is not disqualified on account of alleged prejudice, unless the judge enters an order admitting “that he does not stand fair and impartial between the parties.” § 38.10, Fla.Stat. (1989). See also Brown v. St. George Island, Ltd., 561 So.2d 253 (Fla.1990). In the instant case, the judge did not enter an order admitting her prejudice, but rather found the motion , for disqualification legally insufficient. We find that the trial judge properly denied the appellant’s motion to disqualify. See Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Radin v. Radin, 593 So. 2d 1233, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13427, 1991 WL 272715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

593 So. 2d 1233 (Radin v. Radin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kowalski v. Boyles
557 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Fischer v. Knuck
497 So. 2d 240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Brown v. St. George Island, Ltd.
561 So. 2d 253 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)