Radin v. Radin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Radin v. Radin

573 So. 2d 1039, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 788, 1991 WL 11732

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 1991

DocketNos. 90-0912, 90-2023

StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 1039 (Radin v. Radin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Radin v. Radin, 573 So. 2d 1039, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 788, 1991 WL 11732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Allen S. Radin, appeals in Case No. 90-0912, an order of the trial [1040]*1040court finding him in contempt and ordering his incarceration for failure to pay alimony. Appellant appeals in Case No. 90-2023, an order finding him in contempt and ordering his incarceration for failure to pay alimony payments, and taxing attorney’s fees and costs against him. Appellant’s appeals from these two orders were consolidated, sua sponte, by order of this court. We affirm based on a finding that appellant’s assertions regarding his partial payment of the alimony, failure to receive notice of hearing, and divestment of funds, were unsupported by the record. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.080(f).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Allen S. Radin, appeals in Case No. 90-0912, an order of the trial [1040]*1040court finding him in contempt and ordering his incarceration for failure to pay alimony. Appellant appeals in Case No. 90-2023, an order finding him in contempt and ordering his incarceration for failure to pay alimony payments, and taxing attorney’s fees and costs against him. Appellant’s appeals from these two orders were consolidated, sua sponte, by order of this court. We affirm based on a finding that appellant’s assertions regarding his partial payment of the alimony, failure to receive notice of hearing, and divestment of funds, were unsupported by the record. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.080(f).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 So. 2d 1039, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 788, 1991 WL 11732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radin-v-radin-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack