Racklin-Fagin Construction Corp. v. Villar

156 Misc. 220, 281 N.Y.S. 426, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1312
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 27, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 156 Misc. 220 (Racklin-Fagin Construction Corp. v. Villar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Racklin-Fagin Construction Corp. v. Villar, 156 Misc. 220, 281 N.Y.S. 426, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A contract to paint two pictures of a particular size for hanging in the lobby of plaintiff’s apartment house is a contract for work, labor and services and is not within the purview of the Sales Act (Pers. Prop. Law, §§ 82-159). Since the paintings have been completed and are held by the tenant at the disposal of the plaintiff landlord, the former is entitled in accordance with the contract to be paid the full price by crediting him with the payment of ten months’ rent as it comes due from October 1, 1934, through July 31, 1935. The rent for the last ten months was not due at the time of the commencement of this action, and affirmative judgment for the tenant should not have been granted.

Final order and judgment modified by striking out the award on the counterclaim and by dismissing the same without prejudice, and as modified affirmed.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vitromar Piece Dye Works v. Lawrence of London, Ltd.
256 N.E.2d 135 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1969)
Goelz v. J. K. & Susie L. Wadley Research Institute & Blood Bank
350 S.W.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & Company
195 F. Supp. 621 (S.D. New York, 1961)
Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.
360 P.2d 897 (California Supreme Court, 1961)
Perlmutter v. Beth David Hospital
123 N.E.2d 792 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Voss v. Gray
298 N.W. 1 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1941)
General Shale Products Corp. v. Struck Const. Co.
37 F. Supp. 598 (W.D. Kentucky, 1941)
Sidney Stevens Implement Co. v. Hintze
67 P.2d 632 (Utah Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 Misc. 220, 281 N.Y.S. 426, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/racklin-fagin-construction-corp-v-villar-nyappterm-1935.