Raboy v. Kline

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raboy v. Kline

96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19430

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 1, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 841 (Raboy v. Kline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raboy v. Kline, 96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination by respondent Rock-land Research Institute dated December 7,1981, which terminated petitioner’s employment. Matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, to hear and report in accordance herewith; in the interim the proceeding will be held in abeyance. The report shall be filed with all convenient speed. In view of the directly conflicting affidavits of the parties with regard to whether respondent Rockland Research Institute offered petitioner a position in conformity with the grievance appeals board’s directive that she be permitted to work in an area other than the shop/shipping and receiving area pending the completion of renovations to that area, we remit for a hearing on that issue. Damiani, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination by respondent Rock-land Research Institute dated December 7,1981, which terminated petitioner’s employment. Matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, to hear and report in accordance herewith; in the interim the proceeding will be held in abeyance. The report shall be filed with all convenient speed. In view of the directly conflicting affidavits of the parties with regard to whether respondent Rockland Research Institute offered petitioner a position in conformity with the grievance appeals board’s directive that she be permitted to work in an area other than the shop/shipping and receiving area pending the completion of renovations to that area, we remit for a hearing on that issue. Damiani, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 841, 465 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raboy-v-kline-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack