R. Wayne Johnson v. Steve Dennis and Carol Sanford

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 13, 2013
Docket10-13-00177-CV
StatusPublished

This text of R. Wayne Johnson v. Steve Dennis and Carol Sanford (R. Wayne Johnson v. Steve Dennis and Carol Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. Wayne Johnson v. Steve Dennis and Carol Sanford, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00177-CV

R. WAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant v.

STEVE DENNIS AND CAROL SANFORD, Appellee

From the County Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. C13-22191-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

R. Wayne Johnson, a prison inmate, attempts to appeal the trial court’s dismissal

of Johnson’s underlying civil action. Johnson presented an affidavit of indigence for

filing with his notice of appeal. Johnson did not, however, file an affidavit of previous

filings or a certified copy of his inmate account with his notice of appeal as required by

Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE

ANN. §§ 14.002; 14.004(a) and (c) (West Supp. 2012); 14.006(f) (West 2002). Because

Johnson did not comply with the Chapter 14 affidavit requirements, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous. Douglas v. Turner, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5747 (Tex.

App.—Waco May 9, 2013, no pet. h.).1

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.

APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b); 51.208

(West Supp. 2012); § 51.941(a) (West 2005). Under these circumstances, we suspend the

rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates

or reduces the fees owed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 13, 2013 [CV06]

1This Court is very familiar with Johnson. See Johnson v. Peeples, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 4081 (Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 28, 2013, no pet. h.).

We also note that Johnson is on the list of vexatious litigants maintained by the Office of Court Administration. See http://www.txcourts.gov/oca/vexatiouslitigants.asp.

Johnson v. Dennis Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ralph O. Douglas v. William Turner
441 S.W.3d 337 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Johnson v. Harrison
399 S.W.3d 348 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
R. Wayne Johnson v. Steve Dennis and Carol Sanford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-wayne-johnson-v-steve-dennis-and-carol-sanford-texapp-2013.