R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 28, 2024·No. 23-0730V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-0730V

T.R., Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner,

v. Filed: July 29, 2024 Refiled as Redacted: October 28, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 2024 HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Neil Bhargava, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On May 17, 2023, T.R. filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.1 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine which he received on October 21, 2021, he suffered a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 25, 2024, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Id. at 9 (citing 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), (c)(10)). Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

1 When this Ruling was originally filed, I advised my intent to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'

website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner filed a timely motion to redact certain information. This Ruling is being reissued with reduction of Petitioner’s full name down to his initials throughout the Ruling on Entitlement and in the case caption. Except for those changes and this footnote, no other substantive changes have been made. This Ruling will be posted on the court’s website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, with no further opportunity to move for redaction.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a