R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-0730V
T.R., Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, v. Filed: October 29, 2024
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.
Neil Bhargava, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION ON DAMAGES1
On May 17, 2023, T.R. filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.1 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that as a result of an influenza vaccine received on October 21, 2021, he suffered a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On July 29, 2024, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On October 28, 2024, Respondent filed a Proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”). Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, I award the following compensation:
A lump sum of $67,500.00 (for pain and suffering) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Proffer at 2. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.2
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
T.R.,
Petitioner,
v. No. 23-730V (ECF) Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On May 17, 2023, T.R. (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended (“the Vaccine Act” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C.
§§ 300aa-1 to -34, alleging that he suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
(“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza
vaccine that he received on October 21, 2021. ECF No. 1 at 1. On July 25, 2024, respondent
filed a Rule 4(c) Report, recommending that compensation be awarded. ECF No. 28. On July
29, 2024, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, agreeing with
respondent that petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA. ECF No. 29.
I. Items of Compensation
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $67,500.00 in pain and suffering.
See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under
42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and
the Court’s judgment award the following:1
a. A lump sum payment of $67,500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
VORIS E. JOHNSON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ Neil Bhargava NEIL BHARGAVA Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-3989 Email: neil.bhargava@usdoj.gov
Dated: October 28, 2024
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
R. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.