R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1072, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3369
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Cust. Ct. 219
United States Customs Court·Decided March 11, 1969·No. No. P69/64; protest 67/76776 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1072, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3369 (cusc 1969).

62 Cust. Ct. 1072 (R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.