R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 647, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Cust. Ct. 219
United States Customs Court·Decided September 16, 1968·No. No. P68/389; protests 64/458 and 64/18238 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gitkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 647, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1752 (cusc 1968).

61 Cust. Ct. 647 (R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gitkin Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 383 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)