R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States

19 Cust. Ct. 158, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1125
United States Customs Court·Decided October 29, 1947·No. No. 51986; protests 72505-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of earthenware articles the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Copeland & Thomson, Inc. v. United States (12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833) and Johnson Bros. v. United States (15 id. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 158, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1125 (cusc 1947).

19 Cust. Ct. 158 (R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Copeland & Thompson, Inc. v. United States
12 Cust. Ct. 85 (U.S. Customs Court, 1944)