Quon Quon Co. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 513
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Quon Quon Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Cust. Ct. 178
United States Customs Court·Decided June 20, 1960·No. No. 64317; protests 59/2887, 59/5312, and 59/5943 (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

[514]*514Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of trays, silent butlers, etc., similar in all material respects to those the subject of Ignas Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C.D. 1423), the articles in question were held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 35 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T.D. 49753), for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of copper, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; and (3) the items marked with the letter “0” at 25 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, supra, for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of pewter, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quon Quon Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 513 (cusc 1960).

44 Cust. Ct. 513 (Quon Quon Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 280 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)