Quon Quon Co. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 545
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Quon Quon Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Cust. Ct. 178
United States Customs Court·Decided May 9, 1958·No. No. 61909; protests 138983-K, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinions

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of decorated earthen figures similar in all material respects to exhibits 1, 2, and 4 the subject of Abstract 60180, the claim at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 211 as colored earthenware articles was sustained as to said items. It was further stipulated that the items marked “B” consist of decorated earthen figures similar in all material respects to the merchandise, other than exhibits 1, 2, and 4, the subject of Abstract 60180. As to said articles, 75 percent of the merchandise represented by each such item was held dutiable at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 211 as colored earthenware articles, and 25 percent of such merchandise was held dutiable at 70 percent under paragraph 212 as colored vitrified ware.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quon Quon Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 545 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 545 (Quon Quon Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quon Quon Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 315 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)