Quon Quon Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 373
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Quon Quon Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 315
United States Customs Court·Decided May 12, 1955·No. No. 59056; protest 228977-K (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quon Quon Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 373 (cusc 1955).

34 Cust. Ct. 373 (Quon Quon Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.