Quintero v. Bureau of Immigration & Custom Enforcement

71 F. App'x 336
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2003
Docket03-30353
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 F. App'x 336 (Quintero v. Bureau of Immigration & Custom Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quintero v. Bureau of Immigration & Custom Enforcement, 71 F. App'x 336 (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Petitioner, Jorge Smith Quintero, immigration detainee # 08478-131, appeals the district court’s denial of his 21 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the right of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to detain him indefinitely in light of the Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001). Quintero is an excludable alien who is a Cuban national.

In Zadvydas, the Supreme Court set up a framework in which a deportable alien could establish the unreasonableness of his continued detention and obtain his release, albeit supervised, in a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Id. at 701, 121 S.Ct. 2491. Qunitero’s argument that Zadvydas should apply equally to ex-dudable aliens like himself is foreclosed by this court’s decision in Rios v. INS, 324 F.3d 296, 296 (5th Cir.2003). Instead, this court’s holding in Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 988 F.2d 1437, 1440-47 (5th Cir.), amended by Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir.1993), that there are no time limits on the detention of excluded aliens who have been denied entry governs Quintero’s petition. See Rios, 324 F.3d at 296. The district court did not err in denying the petition.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zadvydas v. Davis
533 U.S. 678 (Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 F. App'x 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quintero-v-bureau-of-immigration-custom-enforcement-ca5-2003.