Quinn v. Sigretto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quinn v. Sigretto

229 A.D. 727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 229 A.D. 727 (Quinn v. Sigretto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quinn v. Sigretto, 229 A.D. 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the trial court had power to correct the judgment if it had included interest to which plaintiff was not entitled, the denial of defendant’s motion was proper, because plaintiff was entitled, under section 480 of the Civil Practice Act, to have interest added to the verdict and included in the judgment, even though not demanded in the complaint or proved on the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the trial court had power to correct the judgment if it had included interest to which plaintiff was not entitled, the denial of defendant’s motion was proper, because plaintiff was entitled, under section 480 of the Civil Practice Act, to have interest added to the verdict and included in the judgment, even though not demanded in the complaint or proved on the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-sigretto-nyappdiv-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack