Quinn v. Sigretto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quinn v. Sigretto

229 A.D. 727

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the trial court had power to correct the judgment if it had included interest to which plaintiff was not entitled, the denial of defendant’s motion was proper, because plaintiff was entitled, under section 480 of the Civil Practice Act, to have interest added to the verdict and included in the judgment, even though not demanded in the complaint or proved on the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the trial court had power to correct the judgment if it had included interest to which plaintiff was not entitled, the denial of defendant’s motion was proper, because plaintiff was entitled, under section 480 of the Civil Practice Act, to have interest added to the verdict and included in the judgment, even though not demanded in the complaint or proved on the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Quinn v. Sigretto, 229 A.D. 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

229 A.D. 727 (Quinn v. Sigretto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related