Quinn v. Quinn

87 A.D.2d 643, 448 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15969
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 23, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 643 (Quinn v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinn v. Quinn, 87 A.D.2d 643, 448 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

In a divorce action, defendant wife appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (De Luca, J.), dated January 7,1982, which, inter alia, awarded temporary custody of the parties’ older child to plaintiff and directed the wife to pay the sums of $75 and $50 per week as temporary maintenance and child support, respectively, and (2) as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated February 3,1982, as, upon granting defendant wife’s motion for reargument, awarded temporary custody of both children of the parties to the plaintiff husband and otherwise adhered to its prior determination. Appeal from order dated January 7, 1982, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The order was superseded by the order entered upon reargument. Order dated February 3, 1982 modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto granting defendant wife reasonable visitation rights. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to fix visitation rights and it is directed that all preliminary trial proceedings shall be conducted expeditiously and completed by May 1, 1982 and the trial shall commence no later than May 15, 1982. In the absence of a “pressing concern” and proof that visitation is “inimical to the welfare of the children”, the parent to whom custody is not awarded must be granted reasonable visitation privileges (see Petraglia v Petraglia, 56 AD2d 923). Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colley v. Colley
200 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Hummel v. Hummel
191 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Eric L. v. Dorothy L.
130 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Meisner v. Meisner
111 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Twersky v. Twersky
103 A.D.2d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Marlow v. Marlow
122 Misc. 2d 221 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Shipp v. Gaglia
97 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Katz v. Katz
97 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Lory v. Lory
119 Misc. 2d 205 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.2d 643, 448 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-quinn-nyappdiv-1982.