Petraglia v. Petraglia

56 A.D.2d 923, 392 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11319
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 28, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 56 A.D.2d 923 (Petraglia v. Petraglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petraglia v. Petraglia, 56 A.D.2d 923, 392 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which plaintiff was previously granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 7, 1976, which (1) approved the issuance of a wage deduction order pursuant to section 49-b of the Personal Property Law and (2) eliminated his weekly visitation privileges. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) deleting therefrom the provision which eliminates weekly visitation privileges and substituting therefor a provision that defendant may have visitation with the two infant children, away from the custodial residence, on alternate Sundays, between 11:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., only upon two days’ notice to plaintiff in advance of each such visitation and (2) adding thereto a provision prohibiting defendant from entering upon plaintiff’s residence and its surrounding property at any time. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Only a " 'pressing concern’ ” and proof that visitation is " 'inimical to the welfare of the children’ ” justifies the deprivation of reasonable visitation (Matter of Doe v Doe, 86 Misc 2d 194, 197). However, plaintiff must be protected from the continuous course of harassment she has been subjected to as a result of such visitation. Finally, the wage deduction order against defendant was proper, since he has not submitted proof of inability to make the support payments (see Personal Property Law, § 49-b, subd 3). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

N.S. v. T.S.
2024 NY Slip Op 50604(U) (New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, 2024)
Matter of Timothy J. v. Gertrude W.
2007 NY Slip Op 52094(U) (Kings Family Court, 2007)
Hummel v. Hummel
191 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Katz v. Katz
97 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Quinn v. Quinn
87 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 923, 392 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petraglia-v-petraglia-nyappdiv-1977.