Quinn v. Austin

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided August 16, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-00665·Unknown

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE

9 10 DION QUINN, CASE NO. C23-0665JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, 13 Defendant. 14

15 Before the court is pro se Plaintiff Dion Quinn’s motion for appointment of 16 counsel. (Mot. (Dkt. # 7).) On June 27, 2023, pursuant to this District’s plan for 17 court-appointed representation, the court concluded that Mr. Quinn had demonstrated an 18 adequate basis to refer his case to the Pro Bono Screening Committee. (See 6/27/23 19 Order (Dkt. # 8) (citing General Order No. 16-20, Section 3 (Dec. 8, 2020)); 7/26/23 20 Order (Dkt. # 9) (granting the Screening Committee’s request for an extension of time to 21 review the case).) The Screening Committee recommended that the court should not 22 assign pro bono counsel in this matter. 1 There is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case. Adir Int’l, LLC v. Starr 2 Indem. & Liab. Co., 994 F.3d 1032, 1038-39 (9th Cir. 2021); United States ex rel.

3 Gardner v. Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965) (stating that the appointment of 4 counsel for a pro se litigant in a civil case “is a privilege and not a right”). Without the 5 Screening Committee’s recommendation to appoint counsel pursuant to this District’s 6 plan for court-appointed representation of civil rights litigants, the court declines to do so. 7 See also Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989) (noting the court lacks 8 authority to compel counsel to provide representation in a civil case). Accordingly, the

9 court DENIES Mr. Quinn’s motion (Dkt. # 7). 10 The court emphasizes that Mr. Quinn is now responsible for pursuing this case 11 without the assistance of counsel. Materials to assist pro se litigants are available on the 12 United States District Court for the Western District of Washington’s website. Although 13 the court can afford some leeway to a pro se litigant, Mr. Quinn is responsible for

14 complying with case deadlines, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Western 15 District of Washington’s Local Rules, which can also be found on the Western District of 16 Washington’s website. 17 Dated this 16th day of August, 2023. 18 A 19 United States District Judge 21 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quinn v. Austin, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Quinn v. Austin (Quinn v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related