Quinlan v. . City of Utica
74 N.Y. 603, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 788
This text of 74 N.Y. 603 (Quinlan v. . City of Utica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Quinlan v. . City of Utica, 74 N.Y. 603, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 788 (N.Y. 1878).
Opinion
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
All concur, except Allen, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Klatz v. Armor Elevator Co.
93 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Gramm v. State
28 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Cole v. New York Racing Ass'n
24 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Boyd v. State
14 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
People v. Williams
159 N.E.2d 549 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
Veit v. State
192 Misc. 205 (New York State Court of Claims, 1948)
Burns v. City of New York
272 A.D.2d 1063 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Dekowski v. County of Montgomery
263 A.D. 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Masciarelli v. Delaware & Hudson Railroad
178 Misc. 458 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
Long v. John Breuner Co.
172 P. 1132 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
City of Chickasha v. White
1915 OK 96 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Cefola v. Siegel-Cooper Co.
127 A.D. 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Heinmiller v. Winston Bros.
107 N.W. 1102 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
Powell v. Nevada, California & Oregon Railway
28 Nev. 305 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1905)
Holzhauser v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
43 Misc. 145 (New York Supreme Court, 1904)
Cavanagh v. O'Neill
27 A.D. 48 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Lundbeck v. City of Brooklyn
26 A.D. 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Turner v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.
119 N.C. 387 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
Turner v. . Lumber Co.
26 S.E. 23 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
Bemis v. Temple
26 L.R.A. 254 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 N.Y. 603, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinlan-v-city-of-utica-ny-1878.