Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe
Opinion
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted June 30, 2014* Decided July 1, 2014
Before
WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
No. 14-1524 Appeal from the United States District Court for QUINCY NERI, the Western District of Plaintiff-Appellant, Wisconsin.
v. No. 11-cv-429-slc Stephen L. Crocker, MELINDA MONROE, et al., Magistrate Judge. Defendants-Appellees.
Order
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons given by the district court.
* This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe (Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.