Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 1, 2014·No. 14-1524·Unpublished

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted June 30, 2014* Decided July 1, 2014

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

No. 14-1524 Appeal from the United States District Court for QUINCY NERI, the Western District of Plaintiff-Appellant, Wisconsin.

v. No. 11-cv-429-slc Stephen L. Crocker, MELINDA MONROE, et al., Magistrate Judge. Defendants-Appellees.

Order

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons given by the district court.

* This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe, (7th Cir. 2014).

Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe (Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.