Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver

76 S.E. 754, 12 Ga. App. 79, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 32
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 21, 1912·No. 4476·Published

Opinion

Pottle, J.

This case falls within tlie well-settled rule that where the evidence is conflicting, the first grant of a new trial, though based • upon special grounds, will not be disturbed. Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co., 9 Ga. App. 510 (71 S. E. 934); Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank, 10 Ga. App. 280 (73 S. E. 424); Strickland v. Brother-ton, 136 Ga. 456 (71 S. E. 774). ' Judgment affirmed.

Trover; from city court of Hall county—Judge Irwin presiding. September 25, 1912. • B. P. Gaillard, Adams & Quillian, for plaintiffs. William M. Johnson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver, 76 S.E. 754, 12 Ga. App. 79, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 32 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

76 S.E. 754 (Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co.
71 S.E. 934 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank
73 S.E. 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)