Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver

76 S.E. 754, 12 Ga. App. 79, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 32
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 21, 1912
Docket4476
StatusPublished

This text of 76 S.E. 754 (Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver, 76 S.E. 754, 12 Ga. App. 79, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 32 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Pottle, J.

This case falls within tlie well-settled rule that where the evidence is conflicting, the first grant of a new trial, though based • upon special grounds, will not be disturbed. Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co., 9 Ga. App. 510 (71 S. E. 934); Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank, 10 Ga. App. 280 (73 S. E. 424); Strickland v. Brother-ton, 136 Ga. 456 (71 S. E. 774). ' Judgment affirmed.

Trover; from city court of Hall county—Judge Irwin presiding. September 25, 1912. • B. P. Gaillard, Adams & Quillian, for plaintiffs. William M. Johnson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co.
71 S.E. 934 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank
73 S.E. 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 754, 12 Ga. App. 79, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quillian-bros-v-oliver-gactapp-1912.