Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver
76 S.E. 754, 12 Ga. App. 79, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 32
Opinion
This case falls within tlie well-settled rule that where the evidence is conflicting, the first grant of a new trial, though based • upon special grounds, will not be disturbed. Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co., 9 Ga. App. 510 (71 S. E. 934); Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank, 10 Ga. App. 280 (73 S. E. 424); Strickland v. Brother-ton, 136 Ga. 456 (71 S. E. 774). ' Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver, 76 S.E. 754, 12 Ga. App. 79, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 32 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
76 S.E. 754 (Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hughes v. Atlanta Steel Co.
71 S.E. 934 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank
73 S.E. 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)