Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank
73 S.E. 424, 10 Ga. App. 280, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 459
Opinion
The presiding judge being dissatisfied with the verdict, and ’ having granted a first new trial, one of the grounds of the motion, among others, being that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, this court will not control his discretion in so doing; nor will this court consider assignments of error based upon his eharge. to the jury, or upon his refusal to direct a verdict, the presumption being that on the second hearing he will correct his own errors, if there be any.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank, 73 S.E. 424, 10 Ga. App. 280, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 459 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
73 S.E. 424 (Georgia Automobile Co. v. Merchants National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quillian & Bros. v. Oliver
76 S.E. 754 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)