Quentin Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Quentin Hedrick v. Daiko Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka, and Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Defendants- Quentin Hedrick v. Espada Nav., S.A., Panama, Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Daiko Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka

733 F.2d 1335, 1984 A.M.C. 2701, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24159

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: March 27, 1984
• Docket: 82-3399
• Status: Published

Opinion

733 F.2d 1335

1984 A.M.C. 2701

Quentin HEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PINE OAK SHIPPING, S.A., Defendant-Appellant.
Quentin HEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAIKO SHOJI CO., LTD., Osaka, and Pine Oak Shipping, S.A.,
Defendants- Appellees.
Quentin HEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ESPADA NAV., S.A., Panama, Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Daiko
Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 81-3588, 81-3597 and 82-3399.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 27, 1984.

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Paul N. Wonacott, Albert J. Bannon, Portland, Or., for appellees.

ORDER

(Opinion September 13, 1983, 9 Cir., 1983, 715 F.2d 1355)

Before GOODWIN, PREGERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

It is ordered that plaintiff's petition for rehearing is granted, 531 F.Supp. 27, and that the portion of the opinion issued herein on September 13, 1983, designated "part III" be withdrawn and that the verdict for the plaintiff be reinstated. The final sentence of the opinion is amended to read: The district court's orders are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.