Home/Ninth Circuit/Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A.

Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A.

733 F.2d 1335, 1984 A.M.C. 2701
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 1984
DocketNos. 81-3588, 81-3597 and 82-3399
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 733 F.2d 1335 (Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., 733 F.2d 1335, 1984 A.M.C. 2701 (9th Cir. 1984).

Opinion

It is ordered that plaintiffs petition for rehearing is granted, 531 F.Supp. 27, and that the portion of the opinion issued herein on September 13, 1983, designated “part III” be withdrawn and that the verdict for the plaintiff be reinstated. The final sentence of the opinion is amended to read: The district court’s orders are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Irving v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
864 F.2d 383 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
Quentin Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Quentin Hedrick v. Daiko Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka, and Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Defendants- Quentin Hedrick v. Espada Nav., S.A., Panama, Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Daiko Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka
733 F.2d 1335 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
733 F.2d 1335, 1984 A.M.C. 2701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedrick-v-pine-oak-shipping-sa-ca9-1984.