Home/Supreme Court/Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. Wilson

Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. Wilson

327 U.S. 767, 90 L. Ed. 998, 66 S. Ct. 805, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 2669
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 11, 1946
DocketNo. 769
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 327 U.S. 767 (Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. Wilson, 327 U.S. 767, 90 L. Ed. 998, 66 S. Ct. 805, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 2669 (1946).

Opinion

Saxl, present Commissioner, substituted for Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Delaware And Hudson Railway Company, Inc. v. Offset Paperback Manufacturers, Inc.
126 F.3d 426 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Delaware & Hudson Railway Co. v. Offset Paperback Manufacturers, Inc.
126 F.3d 426 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Egan v. Oliver (In Re Oliver)
38 B.R. 407 (D. Massachusetts, 1984)
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
687 F.2d 912 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission
687 F.2d 912 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
685 F.2d 170 (Sixth Circuit, 1982)
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission
685 F.2d 170 (Sixth Circuit, 1982)
Central Illinois Public Service Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
659 F.2d 820 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)
Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway, and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company, Intervenors, Burlington Northern Inc. And Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenors, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor. Aliquippa and Southern Railroad Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor
583 F.2d 678 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Baltimore v. United States
583 F.2d 678 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Prince Manufacturing Co. v. United States
437 F. Supp. 1041 (N.D. Illinois, 1977)
Illinois Central Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Cross-Appellee
533 F.2d 272 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
General Mills, Inc. v. United States
364 F. Supp. 1278 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
Middle Atlantic Conference v. United States
353 F. Supp. 1109 (District of Columbia, 1972)
American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission
444 F.2d 824 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Southern Railway Company
364 F.2d 86 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Southern Railway Co.
250 F. Supp. 759 (D. South Carolina, 1966)
Reading Company v. Commodity Credit Corporation
289 F.2d 744 (Third Circuit, 1961)
Western Maryland Railway Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.
154 F. Supp. 508 (D. Maryland, 1957)
Froehling Supply Co. v. United States
194 F.2d 637 (Seventh Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 U.S. 767, 90 L. Ed. 998, 66 S. Ct. 805, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 2669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queenside-hills-realty-co-v-wilson-scotus-1946.