Quarry Co. v. Bliss

12 Abb. Pr. 470
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bv the Court.*

—We think the construction of section 12 of the act by the court below was correct.

The liability of the trustees by that section is of the nature of a penalty or punishment for the omission of a duty.

The section was probably worded without reference to the fact that there would be or might be a change of trustees.

The liability attaches to the individuals who may change, and not the office, which does not change.

We think that the section should be construed as though the words “ during their continuance in office ” had been added to the end of the sentence.

It may be said that these words are impliedly added.

The judgment below should be affirmed, with costs.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quarry Co. v. Bliss, 12 Abb. Pr. 470 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).

12 Abb. Pr. 470 (Quarry Co. v. Bliss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vincent v. Sands
11 Abb. Pr. 366 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1871)