Quarry Co. v. Bliss

New York Supreme Court

Quarry Co. v. Bliss

10 Abb. Pr. 211

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Quarry Co. v. Bliss. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Abb. Pr. 470 →

New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1859·Published

Opinion

Per Sutherland, J.

—It appears from the evidence in this case, that the debt which the plaintiff seeks to recover in this action was not contracted, and did not accrue, until after the 18th of April, 1854, and that the defendants, Bliss and Abernethy, ceased to be trustees on that day. On that ground alone, I think the defendants Bliss and Abernethy must have judgment against the plaintiffs with costs. It is unnecessary to pass upon any other questions in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Sutherland, J.

—It appears from the evidence in this case, that the debt which the plaintiff seeks to recover in this action was not contracted, and did not accrue, until after the 18th of April, 1854, and that the defendants, Bliss and Abernethy, ceased to be trustees on that day. On that ground alone, I think the defendants Bliss and Abernethy must have judgment against the plaintiffs with costs. It is unnecessary to pass upon any other questions in the case.

Quarry Co. v. Bliss, 10 Abb. Pr. 211 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1859).

Pincite

10 Abb. Pr. 211 (Quarry Co. v. Bliss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.