Quantum Electric, Inc. v. Concept Development, Inc.

468 N.W.2d 372, 237 Neb. 927, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 170
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 1991·No. 88-538·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*928 Per Curiam.

Having considered the briefs and the recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court and upon a de novo review of the record, we find that a reasonable controversy existed as to the plaintiff’s right to recover or the amount of such recovery, and therefore the claim was unliquidated. The district court erred in awarding prejudgment interest, and its judgment is ordered modified to exclude the award of prejudgment interest. The judgment of the district court, as modified, is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quantum Electric, Inc. v. Concept Development, Inc., 468 N.W.2d 372, 237 Neb. 927, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 170 (Neb. 1991).

468 N.W.2d 372 (Quantum Electric, Inc. v. Concept Development, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blue Valley Cooperative v. National Farmers Organization
600 N.W.2d 786 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)