Quantez Demilo Brown v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 22, 2021
DocketA21A0930
StatusPublished

This text of Quantez Demilo Brown v. State (Quantez Demilo Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quantez Demilo Brown v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 18, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0930. QUANTEZ DEMILO BROWN v. THE STATE.

In February 2020, Quantez DeMilo Brown was convicted of several crimes including aggravated battery and aggravated assault. Brown’s attorney filed a timely motion for new trial, and then a new attorney entered an appearance on his behalf and filed an amended motion for new trial. The trial court denied the motion for new trial on November 17, 2020. Brown filed a pro se notice of appeal on December 14, 2020. We lack jurisdiction. “A criminal defendant in Georgia does not have the right to represent himself and also be represented by an attorney, and pro se filings by represented parties are therefore unauthorized and without effect.” Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3) (767 SE2d 24) (2014) (punctuation omitted). There is nothing in the record indicating that his attorney either withdrew or was relieved from representation. See White v. State, 302 Ga. 315, 318 (2) (806 SE2d 489) (2017) (“[D]efense counsel’s duties toward their clients extend for at least the 30 days after the entry of judgment when a notice of appeal may be filed.”). Under these circumstances, Brown’s pro se notice of appeal is a nullity. See Soberanis v. State, 345 Ga. App. 403, 405 (812 SE2d 800) (2018). For this reason, the appeal is DISMISSED. See id. Because Brown was represented by counsel before the trial court, he is informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 875-876 (2) (452 SE2d 756) (1995):

This appeal has been dismissed because your attorney failed to file a proper and timely notice of appeal. If you still wish to appeal, you may petition the trial court for leave to file an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file a notice of appeal referencing your conviction. If the trial court denies your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file a notice of appeal referencing the denial of your request for an out-of-time appeal.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to Brown and to his attorney, and the latter also is DIRECTED to send a copy to Brown.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/18/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowland v. State
452 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
Tolbert v. Toole
767 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
SOBERANIS v. the STATE.
812 S.E.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018)
White v. State
806 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Quantez Demilo Brown v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quantez-demilo-brown-v-state-gactapp-2021.