Puryear v. Shrader

Fourth Circuit

Puryear v. Shrader

541 F. App'x 242

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2013·No. No. 13-1680·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anita Puryear appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puryear v. Shrader, No. 8:11-cv-03640-PJM, 2013 WL 1833262 (D.Md. Apr. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anita Puryear appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puryear v. Shrader, No. 8:11-cv-03640-PJM, 2013 WL 1833262 (D.Md. Apr. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Puryear v. Shrader, 541 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

541 F. App'x 242 (Puryear v. Shrader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related