Pupiales v. BLDG Mgt. Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pupiales v. BLDG Mgt. Co., Inc.

126 A.D.3d 491, 2 N.Y.S.3d 798, 2015 NY Slip Op 01988, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2008

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 2015·No. 14490N 158098/12·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered on or about January 22, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and to stay this action pending arbitration proceedings, and denied plaintiffs motion for an order compelling defendant Rishi Patraju to submit to oral swab DNA testing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff waived any objection to arbitration in light of her union’s commencement of the arbitration proceedings on her behalf (see Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 382-383 [1960]; Matter of RRN Assoc. [DAK Elec. Contr. Corp.], 224 AD2d 250 [1st Dept 1996]).

In light of its order compelling arbitration, the motion court *492 providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs application to compel DNA testing of Patraju.

Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Richter and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered on or about January 22, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and to stay this action pending arbitration proceedings, and denied plaintiffs motion for an order compelling defendant Rishi Patraju to submit to oral swab DNA testing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff waived any objection to arbitration in light of her union’s commencement of the arbitration proceedings on her behalf (see Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 382-383 [1960]; Matter of RRN Assoc. [DAK Elec. Contr. Corp.], 224 AD2d 250 [1st Dept 1996]).

In light of its order compelling arbitration, the motion court *492 providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs application to compel DNA testing of Patraju.

Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Richter and Kapnick, JJ.

Pupiales v. BLDG Mgt. Co., Inc., 126 A.D.3d 491, 2 N.Y.S.3d 798, 2015 NY Slip Op 01988, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

126 A.D.3d 491 (Pupiales v. BLDG Mgt. Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related