Punches v. Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Punches v. Schmidt

243 N.W.2d 518, 73 Wis. 2d 206, 1976 Wisc. LEXIS 1134

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1976·No. No. 645 (1974)·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment and order should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Hanley, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Day being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment and order should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Hanley, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Day being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Punches v. Schmidt, 243 N.W.2d 518, 73 Wis. 2d 206, 1976 Wisc. LEXIS 1134 (Wis. 1976).

Pincite

243 N.W.2d 518 (Punches v. Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related