Pulido v. Chrones

559 F.3d 1040, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825, 2009 WL 723989

Opinion

ORDER

In light of Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 530, — L.Ed.2d — (2008), which vacated the judgment of this court, 487 F.3d 669, and remanded, we in turn remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s determination that the appropriate standard of review in a case under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 is harmless error, rather than structural error, when a jury is instructed on alternative theories of guilt.

REMANDED.